AI Search Recommendation Audit
See whether AI answer engines actually recommend your product
We run buyer-intent prompts, score where your brand shows up, map which competitors keep winning, and give you the first pages and proof blocks to ship so AI answers stop skipping you.
Buyer-intent prompt run + scorecard.
We start from public prompts, pages, and citations.
Pricing, alternatives, proof blocks, and comparison backlog.
Live omission case
In a browser-grounded Perplexity run for a sales-team meeting assistant prompt, MeetGeek did not appear at all.
Live control win
In a browser-grounded creator-newsletter prompt, Beehiiv stayed the top recommendation.
Commercial read
The difference was clearer buyer-language framing, stronger comparison coverage, and more citation-friendly proof.
What the audit answers
- • Do answer engines mention your brand at all?
- • Do they recommend you or only list you lower down?
- • Which competitors keep winning the shortlist?
- • Which pages, comparisons, and proof blocks are missing from your citation path?
What you get
Buyer-intent prompt run
We test prompt families like best-in-category, alternatives, versus, pricing, and “worth it” questions for your category.
Recommendation scorecard
For each prompt, we score whether your brand is a top recommendation, top 3, mentioned lower, or omitted entirely.
Competitor citation map
We capture who wins above you and what framing, proof, or category pages make them easier for engines to cite.
Fix backlog
You get the first pages and proof blocks to ship next: pricing, alternatives, comparisons, audience pages, FAQs, and proof strips.
Sample proof from recent runs
MeetGeek: recommendation gap
Prompt tested: What are the best AI meeting assistant tools in 2026 for a sales team?
Observed shortlist: Gong, Avoma, Fireflies.ai, tl;dv, and Read AI.
Diagnosis: sales-team prompts rewarded coaching, CRM follow-up, and revenue-intelligence framing. MeetGeek fell out of the recommendation set entirely.
Beehiiv: recommendation control win
Prompt tested: What is the best newsletter platform for creators in 2026?
Observed answer lead: Beehiiv stayed the top recommendation.
Diagnosis: creator-growth, monetization, referrals, and audience-ownership framing aligned tightly with the buyer-intent query.
Fastest next step
Send four inputs and we can start from visible proof
No discovery call required for the first pass. We only need the product or brand, the URL or category, the buyer prompt or use case you care about most, and the package that fits.
Packages
Quick Audit
$249
- • one category
- • two buyer-intent prompts
- • one scorecard
- • top 5 fixes
Revenue Audit
$749
- • one category
- • full prompt-pack pass
- • competitor citation map
- • 7-day and 30-day plan
- • exact page priority list
Sprint Add-On
Custom
- • pricing pages
- • alternatives and vs pages
- • audience pages
- • FAQ blocks and proof strips
Best fit
Good fit
- • SaaS teams already investing in SEO/content
- • operators who want proof before buying more content
- • teams losing shortlist visibility to stronger competitors
Not a fit
- • pre-launch products with no category demand
- • teams expecting outreach or posting without approval
- • buyers looking for vague “AI strategy” decks
Want to know why AI answers keep naming your competitors first?
The fastest fix is not guessing. It is seeing the exact prompts, winners, citations, and missing pages that are costing you the recommendation.